Pengukuran User Experience Platform Otomasi Proses berbasis Low Code Menggunakan UEQ
Abstract
This study analyzes the user experience of a Low Code-based Process Automation Platform to enhance efficiency, productivity, and accuracy in business processes. In this study, an analysis of user experience was carried out using a modified long version of the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ), consisting of six scales: attractiveness, perspicuity, efficiency, dependability, stimulation, and novelty. Based on the evaluation of the 26 items from the UEQ, the dependability and novelty scales scored the lowest compared to the other scales. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the aspects related to these two scales in order to enhance the platform's role in improving the holistic user experience of the platform.
Downloads
References
J. W. P. Ng, N. Azarmi, M. Leida, F. Saffre, A. Afzal, and P. D. Yoo, “The intelligent campus (iCampus): End-to-end learning lifecycle of a knowledge ecosystem,” Proc. - 2010 6th Int. Conf. Intell. Environ. IE 2010, pp. 332–337, 2010, doi: 10.1109/IE.2010.68.
S. H. Supangkat, F. Hidayat, I. A. Dahlan, and F. Hamami, “The implementation of traffic analytics using deep learning and big data technology with garuda smart city framework,” in 2019 IEEE 8th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics, GCCE 2019, 2019, doi: 10.1109/GCCE46687.2019.9015300.
R. Breton and E. Bosse, “The Cognitive Costs and Benefits of Automation,” Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 46th Annu. Meet., no. October 2002, pp. 7–9, 2002.
S. Z. Jovanović, J. S. Đurić, and T. V Šibalija, “Robotic Process Automation: Overview and Opportunities,” Int. J. ’ ’Advanced Qual., vol. 46, no. May, 2019.
M. Romao, J. Costa, and C. J. Costa, “Robotic process automation: A case study in the banking industry,” Iber. Conf. Inf. Syst. Technol. Cist., vol. 2019-June, no. June, pp. 19–22, 2019, doi: 10.23919/CISTI.2019.8760733.
W. van der Aalst, Robotic Process Automation Management, Technology, Applications. De Gruyter, 2021.
L. V. Herm, C. Janiesch, A. Helm, F. Imgrund, A. Hofmann, and A. Winkelmann, A framework for implementing robotic process automation projects, no. 0123456789. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2022.
A. Sobczak and L. Ziora, “The Use of Robotic Process Automation (RPA) as an Element of Smart City Implementation: A Case Study of Electricity Billing Document Management at Bydgoszcz City Hall,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 16, p. 5191, 2021, doi: 10.3390/en14165191.
D. Pinho, A. Aguiar, and V. Amaral, “What about the usability in low-code platforms? A systematic literature review,” J. Comput. Lang., vol. 74, no. November 2022, p. 101185, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.cola.2022.101185.
M. Dalibor et al., “Generating customized low-code development platforms for digital twins,” J. Comput. Lang., vol. 70, no. November 2021, p. 101117, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cola.2022.101117.
L. Sigerson and C. Cheng, “Scales for measuring user engagement with social network sites: A systematic review of psychometric properties,” Computers in Human Behavior. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.023.
R. Armstrong and G. Jiménez, “Micro-Skills for Learning Soft Systems Methodology? Challenges and Opportunities in an Undergraduate Dissertation Project,” Syst. Pract. Action Res., 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11213-022-09595-y.
M. Schrepp, A. Hinderks, and J. Thomaschewski, “Design and Evaluation of a Short Version of the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ-S),” Int. J. Interact. Multimed. Artif. Intell., 2017, doi: 10.9781/ijimai.2017.09.001.
