Analisis Hasil Belajar Efektif Dari Penerapan Smart Learning
Abstract
A smart city is an urban place where information technology and digital communication are used to increase knowledge and utilize technology, intellectual resources and real to improve the quality of life. One of the main areas of smart cities is intelligent learning and education, which is a new concept of technology-enhanced learning. Measuring the effectiveness of smart education depends on measuring the desired learning outcomes. This paper suggests the main key features that must be considered when developing learning analysis tools to measure and assess each subject's learning outcomes. And it shows the relationship between an intelligent learning environment, learning outcomes and learning analysis.
Downloads
References
S. Singh, “Smart Cities--A 1.5 Trillion Market Opportunity,” Forbes. Retrieved, vol. 4, 2014.
S. Jang, “Study on service models of digital textbooks in cloud computing environment for SMART education,” Int. J. u-and e-Service, Sci. Technol., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 73–82, 2014.
V. Tikhomirov, N. Dneprovskaya, and E. Yankovskaya, “Three Dimensions of Smart Education,” in Smart Education and Smart e-Learning, Springer, 2015, pp. 47–56.
X. Liu, R. Huang, and T.-W. Chang, “Design of Theoretical Model for Smart Learning,” in State-of-theArt and Future Directions of Smart Learning, Springer, 2016, pp. 77–86.
R. Koper, “Conditions for effective smart learning environments,” Smart Learn. Environ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2014.
G.-J. Hwang, T.-C. Yang, C.-C. Tsai, and S. J. H. Yang, “A context-aware ubiquitous learning environment for conducting complex science experiments,” Comput. Educ., vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 402–413, 2009.
K. B. Lawlor, “Smart goals: How the application of smart goals can contribute to achievement of student learning outcomes,” Dev. Bus. Simul. Exp. Learn., vol. 39, 2012.
D. Boulanger, J. Seanosky, V. Kumar, K. Panneerselvam, T. S. Somasundaram, and others, “Smart Learning Analytics,” in Emerging Issues in Smart Learning, Springer, 2015, pp. 289–296.
A. van Barneveld, K. E. Arnold, and J. P. Campbell, “Analytics in higher education: Establishing a common language,” Educ. Learn. Initiat., vol. 1, pp. 1–11, 2012.
G.-J. Hwang, “Definition, framework and research issues of smart learning environments-a context-aware ubiquitous learning perspective,” Smart Learn. Environ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2014.
S. Retalis, A. Papasalouros, Y. Psaromiligkos, S. Siscos, and T. Kargidis, “Towards Networked Learning Analytics--A concept and a tool,” in Proceedings of the fifth international conference on networked learning, 2006.
S. Dawson, L. Heathcote, and G. Poole, “Harnessing ICT potential: The adoption and analysis of ICT systems for enhancing the student learning experience,” Int. J. Educ. Manag., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 116–128, 2010.
D. Norris, L. Baer, and M. Offerman, “A national agenda for action analytics,” in National Symposium on Action Analytics, 2009, pp. 21–23.
